TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognosis in patients with sentinel node - positive melanoma is accurately defined by the combined Rotterdam tumor load and dewar topography criteria
AU - Van Der Ploeg, Augustinus P.T.
AU - Van Akkooi, Alexander C.J.
AU - Rutkowski, Piotr
AU - Nowecki, Zbigniew I.
AU - Michej, Wanda
AU - Mitra, Angana
AU - Newton-Bishop, Julia A.
AU - Cook, Martin
AU - Van Der Ploeg, Iris M.C.
AU - Nieweg, Omgo E.
AU - Van Den Hout, Mari F.C.M.
AU - Van Leeuwen, Paul A.M.
AU - Voit, Christiane A.
AU - Cataldo, Francesco
AU - Testori, Alessandro
AU - Robert, Caroline
AU - Hoekstra, Harald J.
AU - Verhoef, Cornelis
AU - Spatz, Alain
AU - Eggermont, Alexander M.M.
PY - 2011/6/1
Y1 - 2011/6/1
N2 - Purpose: Prognosis in patients with sentinel node (SN) -positive melanoma correlates with several characteristics of the metastases in the SN such as size and site. These factors reflect biologic behavior and may separate out patients who may or may not need additional locoregional and/or systemic therapy. Patients and Methods: Between 1993 and 2008, 1,080 patients (509 women and 571 men) were diagnosed with tumor burden in the SN in nine European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) melanoma group centers. In total, 1,009 patients (93%) underwent completion lymph node dissection (CLND). Median Breslow thickness was 3.00 mm. The median follow-up time was 37 months. Tumor load and tumor site were reclassified in all nodes by the Rotterdam criteria for size and in 88% by the Dewar criteria for topography. Results: Patients with submicrometastases (< 0.1 mm in diameter) were shown to have an estimated 5-year overall survival rate of 91% and a low nonsentinel node (NSN) positivity rate of 9%. This is comparable to the rate in SN-negative patients. The strongest predictive parameter for NSN positivity and prognostic parameter for survival was the Rotterdam-Dewar Combined (RDC) criteria. Patients with submicrometastases that were present in the subcapsular area only, had an NSN positivity rate of 2% and an estimated 5- and 10-year melanoma-specific survival (MSS) of 95%. Conclusion: Patients with metastases < 0.1 mm, especially when present in the subcapsular area only, may be overtreated by a routine CLND and have an MSS that is indistinguishable from that of SN-negative patients. Thus the RDC criteria provide a rational basis for decision making in the absence of conclusions provided by randomized controlled trials.
AB - Purpose: Prognosis in patients with sentinel node (SN) -positive melanoma correlates with several characteristics of the metastases in the SN such as size and site. These factors reflect biologic behavior and may separate out patients who may or may not need additional locoregional and/or systemic therapy. Patients and Methods: Between 1993 and 2008, 1,080 patients (509 women and 571 men) were diagnosed with tumor burden in the SN in nine European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) melanoma group centers. In total, 1,009 patients (93%) underwent completion lymph node dissection (CLND). Median Breslow thickness was 3.00 mm. The median follow-up time was 37 months. Tumor load and tumor site were reclassified in all nodes by the Rotterdam criteria for size and in 88% by the Dewar criteria for topography. Results: Patients with submicrometastases (< 0.1 mm in diameter) were shown to have an estimated 5-year overall survival rate of 91% and a low nonsentinel node (NSN) positivity rate of 9%. This is comparable to the rate in SN-negative patients. The strongest predictive parameter for NSN positivity and prognostic parameter for survival was the Rotterdam-Dewar Combined (RDC) criteria. Patients with submicrometastases that were present in the subcapsular area only, had an NSN positivity rate of 2% and an estimated 5- and 10-year melanoma-specific survival (MSS) of 95%. Conclusion: Patients with metastases < 0.1 mm, especially when present in the subcapsular area only, may be overtreated by a routine CLND and have an MSS that is indistinguishable from that of SN-negative patients. Thus the RDC criteria provide a rational basis for decision making in the absence of conclusions provided by randomized controlled trials.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957970164&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.6760
DO - 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.6760
M3 - Article
C2 - 21519012
AN - SCOPUS:79957970164
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 29
SP - 2206
EP - 2214
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 16
ER -