TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognosis of stage III or IV primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma
AU - Dubernard, G.
AU - Morice, P.
AU - Rey, A.
AU - Camatte, S.
AU - Fourchotte, V.
AU - Thoury, A.
AU - Pomel, C.
AU - Pautier, P.
AU - Lhommé, C.
AU - Duvillard, P.
AU - Castaigne, D.
PY - 2004/11/1
Y1 - 2004/11/1
N2 - Aims. To study the prognosis of patients with stage IIIC/IV primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma (PSPC) (study group) compared with that of patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) (control group). Methods. A retrospective case-control study including a study group of 37 patients who were matched with a control group of 37 patients. Patients were matched for the histologic subtype (serous tumor), tumor stage, tumor grade, residual disease at the end of debulking surgery (initial or interval) and age (±5 years). Results. Debulking surgery was performed initially or at interval surgery in respectively, 10 and 27 patients in the study group and 17 and 20 in the control group. All patients were treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (combined with paclitaxel in 33) in both groups. The overall survival rate at 3 years in the study and control groups was, respectively, 60% versus 55% (NS). However, event-free survival rates at 3 years (CI 95%) were statistically different (respectively, 29% in the study group versus 16% in the control group: p=0.008). Conclusions. Peritoneal disease is more bulky in patients with PSPC. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is more often required to achieve optimal debulking surgery in PSPC. Overall survival of patients with PSPC is similar to that of their EOC counterparts. Thus, the management of PSPC should not be different from that of advanced stage EOC.
AB - Aims. To study the prognosis of patients with stage IIIC/IV primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma (PSPC) (study group) compared with that of patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) (control group). Methods. A retrospective case-control study including a study group of 37 patients who were matched with a control group of 37 patients. Patients were matched for the histologic subtype (serous tumor), tumor stage, tumor grade, residual disease at the end of debulking surgery (initial or interval) and age (±5 years). Results. Debulking surgery was performed initially or at interval surgery in respectively, 10 and 27 patients in the study group and 17 and 20 in the control group. All patients were treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (combined with paclitaxel in 33) in both groups. The overall survival rate at 3 years in the study and control groups was, respectively, 60% versus 55% (NS). However, event-free survival rates at 3 years (CI 95%) were statistically different (respectively, 29% in the study group versus 16% in the control group: p=0.008). Conclusions. Peritoneal disease is more bulky in patients with PSPC. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is more often required to achieve optimal debulking surgery in PSPC. Overall survival of patients with PSPC is similar to that of their EOC counterparts. Thus, the management of PSPC should not be different from that of advanced stage EOC.
KW - Debulking surgery
KW - Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
KW - Peritoneal carcinoma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=7744231704&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.08.005
DO - 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.08.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 15498644
AN - SCOPUS:7744231704
SN - 0748-7983
VL - 30
SP - 976
EP - 981
JO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology
JF - European Journal of Surgical Oncology
IS - 9
ER -