TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic impact of positive microscopic margins (R1 resection) in patients with GIST (gastrointestinal stromal tumours)
T2 - Results of a multicenter European study
AU - AFC working group and FREGAT network
AU - Thibaut, Flore
AU - Veziant, Julie
AU - Warlaumont, Maxime
AU - Gauthier, Victoria
AU - Lefèvre, Jérémie
AU - Gronnier, Caroline
AU - Bonnet, Stephane
AU - Mabrut, Jean Yves
AU - Regimbeau, Jean Marc
AU - Benhaim, Léonor
AU - Tiberio, G. A.M.
AU - Mathonnet, Muriel
AU - Regenet, Nicolas
AU - Chirica, Mircea
AU - Glehen, Olivier
AU - Mariani, Pascale
AU - Panis, Yves
AU - Genser, Laurent
AU - Mutter, Didier
AU - Théreaux, Jérémie
AU - Bergeat, Damien
AU - Le Roy, Bertrand
AU - Brigand, Cécile
AU - Eveno, Clarisse
AU - Guillaume, Piessen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology
PY - 2024/6/1
Y1 - 2024/6/1
N2 - Background: Although several prognostic factors in GIST have been well studied such as tumour size, mitotic rate, or localization, the influence of microscopic margins or R1 resection remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of R1 resection on the prognosis of GIST in a large multicentre retrospective series of patients. Methods: From 2001 to 2013, 1413 patients who underwent surgery for any site of GIST were identified from 61 European centers. 1098 patients were included, excluding synchronous metastases, concurrent malignancies, R2 resection or GIST recurrence. Tumour rupture (TR) was reclassified according to the Oslo sarcoma classification. Cox proportional hazards ratio and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to analyse 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS). Results: Of 1098 patients, 38 (3%) underwent R1 resection with a risk of TR of 11%. The 5-year RFS was 89.6% with a median follow-up of 81 months [range: 31.2–152 months]. On univariate analysis, lower RFS was significantly associated with R1 resection [HR = 2.13; p = 0.04], high risk score according to the modified NIH classification, administration of adjuvant therapy [HR = 2.24; p < 0.001] and intraoperative complications [HR = 2.82; p < 0.001]. Only intraoperative complications [HR = 1.79; p = 0.02] and high risk according to the modified NIH classification including the updated definition of TR [HR = 3.43; p = 0.04] remained significant on multivariate analysis. Conclusion: This study shows that positive microscopic margins are not an independent predictive factor for RFS in GIST when taking into account the up-dated classification of TR. R1 resection may be considered a reasonable alternative to avoid major functional sequelae and should not lead to reoperation.
AB - Background: Although several prognostic factors in GIST have been well studied such as tumour size, mitotic rate, or localization, the influence of microscopic margins or R1 resection remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of R1 resection on the prognosis of GIST in a large multicentre retrospective series of patients. Methods: From 2001 to 2013, 1413 patients who underwent surgery for any site of GIST were identified from 61 European centers. 1098 patients were included, excluding synchronous metastases, concurrent malignancies, R2 resection or GIST recurrence. Tumour rupture (TR) was reclassified according to the Oslo sarcoma classification. Cox proportional hazards ratio and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to analyse 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS). Results: Of 1098 patients, 38 (3%) underwent R1 resection with a risk of TR of 11%. The 5-year RFS was 89.6% with a median follow-up of 81 months [range: 31.2–152 months]. On univariate analysis, lower RFS was significantly associated with R1 resection [HR = 2.13; p = 0.04], high risk score according to the modified NIH classification, administration of adjuvant therapy [HR = 2.24; p < 0.001] and intraoperative complications [HR = 2.82; p < 0.001]. Only intraoperative complications [HR = 1.79; p = 0.02] and high risk according to the modified NIH classification including the updated definition of TR [HR = 3.43; p = 0.04] remained significant on multivariate analysis. Conclusion: This study shows that positive microscopic margins are not an independent predictive factor for RFS in GIST when taking into account the up-dated classification of TR. R1 resection may be considered a reasonable alternative to avoid major functional sequelae and should not lead to reoperation.
KW - GIST
KW - Microscopic positive margins
KW - R1 resection
KW - Tumor rupture
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85189802873&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108310
DO - 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108310
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85189802873
SN - 0748-7983
VL - 50
JO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology
JF - European Journal of Surgical Oncology
IS - 6
M1 - 108310
ER -