TY - JOUR
T1 - Protocol of the Definition for the Assessment of Time-to-event Endpoints in CANcer trials (DATECAN) project
T2 - Formal consensus method for the development of guidelines for standardised time-to-event endpoints' definitions in cancer clinical trials
AU - Bellera, Carine A.
AU - Pulido, Marina
AU - Gourgou, Sophie
AU - Collette, Laurence
AU - Doussau, Adélaïde
AU - Kramar, Andrew
AU - Dabakuyo, Tienhan Sandrine
AU - Ouali, Monia
AU - Auperin, Anne
AU - Filleron, Thomas
AU - Fortpied, Catherine
AU - Le Tourneau, Christophe
AU - Paoletti, Xavier
AU - Mauer, Murielle
AU - Mathoulin-Pélissier, Simone
AU - Bonnetain, Franck
N1 - Funding Information:
This research project is funded by a research grant from La Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer and is also endorsed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the French National Cancer Institute (INCa). The sponsor had no role in the design of the study, analysis of data or drafting of the manuscript.
PY - 2013/3/1
Y1 - 2013/3/1
N2 - Introduction: In randomised phase III cancer clinical trials, the most objectively defined and only validated time-to-event endpoint is overall survival (OS). The appearance of new types of treatments and the multiplication of lines of treatment have resulted in the use of surrogate endpoints for overall survival such as progression-free survival (PFS), or time-to-treatment failure. Their development is strongly influenced by the necessity of reducing clinical trial duration, cost and number of patients. However, while these endpoints are frequently used, they are often poorly defined and definitions can differ between trials which may limit their use as primary endpoints. Moreover, this variability of definitions can impact on the trial's results by affecting estimation of treatments' effects. The aim of the Definition for the Assessment of Time-to-event Endpoints in CANcer trials (DATECAN) project is to provide recommendations for standardised definitions of time-to-event endpoints in randomised cancer clinical trials. Methods: We will use a formal consensus methodology based on experts' opinions which will be obtained in a systematic manner. Results: Definitions will be independently developed for several cancer sites, including pancreatic, breast, head and neck and colon cancer, as well as sarcomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). Discussion: The DATECAN project should lead to the elaboration of recommendations that can then be used as guidelines by researchers participating in clinical trials. This process should lead to a standardisation of the definitions of commonly used time-to-event endpoints, enabling appropriate comparisons of future trials' results.
AB - Introduction: In randomised phase III cancer clinical trials, the most objectively defined and only validated time-to-event endpoint is overall survival (OS). The appearance of new types of treatments and the multiplication of lines of treatment have resulted in the use of surrogate endpoints for overall survival such as progression-free survival (PFS), or time-to-treatment failure. Their development is strongly influenced by the necessity of reducing clinical trial duration, cost and number of patients. However, while these endpoints are frequently used, they are often poorly defined and definitions can differ between trials which may limit their use as primary endpoints. Moreover, this variability of definitions can impact on the trial's results by affecting estimation of treatments' effects. The aim of the Definition for the Assessment of Time-to-event Endpoints in CANcer trials (DATECAN) project is to provide recommendations for standardised definitions of time-to-event endpoints in randomised cancer clinical trials. Methods: We will use a formal consensus methodology based on experts' opinions which will be obtained in a systematic manner. Results: Definitions will be independently developed for several cancer sites, including pancreatic, breast, head and neck and colon cancer, as well as sarcomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). Discussion: The DATECAN project should lead to the elaboration of recommendations that can then be used as guidelines by researchers participating in clinical trials. This process should lead to a standardisation of the definitions of commonly used time-to-event endpoints, enabling appropriate comparisons of future trials' results.
KW - Clinical protocol
KW - Clinical trial surrogate endpoints
KW - Endpoint definitions
KW - Guidelines as topic
KW - Survival analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873707369&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.09.035
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.09.035
M3 - Article
C2 - 23122780
AN - SCOPUS:84873707369
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 49
SP - 769
EP - 781
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
IS - 4
ER -