Quality indicators in ovarian cancer surgery: Report from the french society of gynecologic oncology (Société Française d'Oncologie Gynécologique, SFOG)

D. Querleu, I. Ray-Coquard, J. M. Classe, J. S. Aucouturier, F. Bonnet, P. Bonnier, E. Darai, M. Devouassoux, L. Gladieff, O. Glehen, C. Haie-Meder, F. Joly, F. Lécuru, J. P. Lefranc, C. Lhommé, P. Morice, A. Salengro, E. Stoeckle, S. Taieb, Z. X. ZengE. Leblanc

    Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

    34 Citations (Scopus)

    Résumé

    Background: Based on registries, the European experience has been that <50% of patients are treated according to protocols and/or benefit from the minimum required surgery for ovarian cancer. The French Cancer Plan 2009-2013 considers the definition of qualitative indicators in ovarian cancer surgery in France. This endeavour was undertaken by the French Society of Gynaecologic Oncology (SFOG) in partnership with the French National College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and all concerned learned societies in a multidisciplinary mindset. Methods: The quality indicators for the initial management of patients with ovarian cancer were based on the standards of practice determined from scientific evidence or expert consensus. Results: The indicators were divided into structural indicators, including material (equipment), human (number and qualification of staff), and organizational resources, process indicators, and outcome indicators. Conclusions: The enforcement of a quality assurance programme in any country would undoubtedly promote improvement in the quality of care for ovarian cancer patients and would result in a dramatic positive impact on their survival. Such a policy is not only beneficial to the patient, but is also profitable for the healthcare system.

    langue originaleAnglais
    Pages (de - à)2732-2739
    Nombre de pages8
    journalAnnals of Oncology
    Volume24
    Numéro de publication11
    Les DOIs
    étatPublié - 1 janv. 2013

    Contient cette citation