TY - JOUR
T1 - Quality of Sarcoma Care
T2 - Longitudinal Real-Time Assessment and Evidence Analytics of Quality Indicators
AU - Heesen, Philip
AU - Studer, Gabriela
AU - Bode, Beata
AU - Windegger, Hubi
AU - Staeheli, Benjamin
AU - Aliu, Paul
AU - Martin-Broto, Javier
AU - Gronchi, Alessandro
AU - Blay, Jean Yves
AU - Le Cesne, Axel
AU - Fuchs, Bruno
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors.
PY - 2023/1/1
Y1 - 2023/1/1
N2 - Sarcomas represent a large group of rare to very rare diseases, requiring complex management with a transdisciplinary approach. Overall progress has been hampered because of discipline, institution and network fragmentation, and there is no global data harmonization or quality standards. To report on and improve quality, a common definition of quality indicators (QIs) of sarcoma care as well as the capacity to assess longitudinal real-time data is required. An international advisory board of world-renowned sarcoma experts defined six categories of QIs, totaling more than 80 quality indicators. An interoperable (web-based) digital platform was then created combining the management of the weekly sarcoma board meeting with the sarcoma registry and incorporating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into the routine follow-up care to assess the entire care cycle of the patient. The QIs were then programmed into the digital platform for real-time analysis and visualization. The definition of standardized QIs covering all physician- (diagnostics and therapeutics), patient- (PROMS/PREMS), and cost-based aspects in combination with their real-time assessment over the entire sarcoma care cycle can be realized. Standardized QIs as well as their real-time assessment and data visualization are critical to improving the quality of sarcoma care. By enabling predictive modelling and introducing VBHC, precision health care for a complex disease is on the horizon.
AB - Sarcomas represent a large group of rare to very rare diseases, requiring complex management with a transdisciplinary approach. Overall progress has been hampered because of discipline, institution and network fragmentation, and there is no global data harmonization or quality standards. To report on and improve quality, a common definition of quality indicators (QIs) of sarcoma care as well as the capacity to assess longitudinal real-time data is required. An international advisory board of world-renowned sarcoma experts defined six categories of QIs, totaling more than 80 quality indicators. An interoperable (web-based) digital platform was then created combining the management of the weekly sarcoma board meeting with the sarcoma registry and incorporating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into the routine follow-up care to assess the entire care cycle of the patient. The QIs were then programmed into the digital platform for real-time analysis and visualization. The definition of standardized QIs covering all physician- (diagnostics and therapeutics), patient- (PROMS/PREMS), and cost-based aspects in combination with their real-time assessment over the entire sarcoma care cycle can be realized. Standardized QIs as well as their real-time assessment and data visualization are critical to improving the quality of sarcoma care. By enabling predictive modelling and introducing VBHC, precision health care for a complex disease is on the horizon.
KW - data annotation
KW - integrated practice unit
KW - interoperable digital platform
KW - quality indicators
KW - real-time assessment
KW - sarcoma
KW - value-based health care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145932345&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/cancers15010047
DO - 10.3390/cancers15010047
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85145932345
SN - 2072-6694
VL - 15
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
IS - 1
M1 - 47
ER -