Quality of Sarcoma Care: Longitudinal Real-Time Assessment and Evidence Analytics of Quality Indicators

Philip Heesen, Gabriela Studer, Beata Bode, Hubi Windegger, Benjamin Staeheli, Paul Aliu, Javier Martin-Broto, Alessandro Gronchi, Jean Yves Blay, Axel Le Cesne, Bruno Fuchs

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

7 Citations (Scopus)

Résumé

Sarcomas represent a large group of rare to very rare diseases, requiring complex management with a transdisciplinary approach. Overall progress has been hampered because of discipline, institution and network fragmentation, and there is no global data harmonization or quality standards. To report on and improve quality, a common definition of quality indicators (QIs) of sarcoma care as well as the capacity to assess longitudinal real-time data is required. An international advisory board of world-renowned sarcoma experts defined six categories of QIs, totaling more than 80 quality indicators. An interoperable (web-based) digital platform was then created combining the management of the weekly sarcoma board meeting with the sarcoma registry and incorporating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into the routine follow-up care to assess the entire care cycle of the patient. The QIs were then programmed into the digital platform for real-time analysis and visualization. The definition of standardized QIs covering all physician- (diagnostics and therapeutics), patient- (PROMS/PREMS), and cost-based aspects in combination with their real-time assessment over the entire sarcoma care cycle can be realized. Standardized QIs as well as their real-time assessment and data visualization are critical to improving the quality of sarcoma care. By enabling predictive modelling and introducing VBHC, precision health care for a complex disease is on the horizon.

langue originaleAnglais
Numéro d'article47
journalCancers
Volume15
Numéro de publication1
Les DOIs
étatPublié - 1 janv. 2023
Modification externeOui

Contient cette citation