TY - JOUR
T1 - Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Study of Tilsotolimod in Combination With Ipilimumab Versus Ipilimumab Alone in Patients With Advanced Refractory Melanoma (ILLUMINATE-301)
AU - Diab, Adi
AU - Ascierto, Paolo A.
AU - Maio, Michele
AU - Abdel-Wahab, Reham
AU - Negrier, Sylvie
AU - Mortier, Laurent
AU - Arenberger, Petr
AU - Dalle, Stephane
AU - Krajsova, Ivana
AU - Cruz, Luis de la
AU - Leccia, Marie Therese
AU - Guida, Michele
AU - Lebbe, Celeste
AU - Grob, Jean Jacques
AU - Butler, Marcus O.
AU - In, Gino K.
AU - Loquai, Carmen
AU - Walker, John W.T.
AU - Atkinson, Victoria
AU - Kapiteijn, Ellen
AU - Haferkamp, Sebastian
AU - Chunduru, Srinivas
AU - Rahimian, Shahram
AU - Guidoboni, Massimo
AU - Robert, Caroline
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2025/1/1
Y1 - 2025/1/1
N2 - PURPOSE There are limited treatment options for advanced melanoma that have progressed during or after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Intratumoral (IT) immunotherapy may improve tumor-specific immune activation by promoting local tumor antigen presentation while avoiding systemic toxicities. The phase 3 ILLUMINATE-301 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03445533) evaluated tilsotolimod, a Toll-like receptor-9 agonist, with or without ipilimumab in patients with anti–PD-1 advanced refractory melanoma. METHODS Patients with unresectable stage III-IV melanoma that progressed during or after anti–PD-1 therapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive 24 weeks of tilsotolimod plus ipilimumab or 10 weeks of ipilimumab alone. Nine IT injections of tilsotolimod were administered to a single designated lesion over 24 weeks. Intravenous ipilimumab 3 mg/kg was administered once every 3 weeks from week 2 in the tilsotolimod arm and week 1 in the ipilimumab arm. The primary end point was efficacy measured using objective response rate (ORR; independent review) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS A total of 481 patients received tilsotolimod plus ipilimumab (n 5 238) or ipilimumab alone (n 5 243). ORRs were 8.8% in the tilsotolimod arm and 8.6% in the ipilimumab arm, with disease control rates of 34.5% and 27.2%, respectively. Median OS was 11.6 months in the tilsotolimod arm and 10 months in the ipilimumab arm (hazard ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.19]; P 5 .7). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 61.1% and 55.5% of patients in the tilsotolimod and ipilimumab arms, respectively. CONCLUSION Combining IT tilsotolimod with ipilimumab did not significantly improve the ORR or OS compared with ipilimumab alone in patients with anti–PD-1 advanced refractory melanoma.
AB - PURPOSE There are limited treatment options for advanced melanoma that have progressed during or after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Intratumoral (IT) immunotherapy may improve tumor-specific immune activation by promoting local tumor antigen presentation while avoiding systemic toxicities. The phase 3 ILLUMINATE-301 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03445533) evaluated tilsotolimod, a Toll-like receptor-9 agonist, with or without ipilimumab in patients with anti–PD-1 advanced refractory melanoma. METHODS Patients with unresectable stage III-IV melanoma that progressed during or after anti–PD-1 therapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive 24 weeks of tilsotolimod plus ipilimumab or 10 weeks of ipilimumab alone. Nine IT injections of tilsotolimod were administered to a single designated lesion over 24 weeks. Intravenous ipilimumab 3 mg/kg was administered once every 3 weeks from week 2 in the tilsotolimod arm and week 1 in the ipilimumab arm. The primary end point was efficacy measured using objective response rate (ORR; independent review) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS A total of 481 patients received tilsotolimod plus ipilimumab (n 5 238) or ipilimumab alone (n 5 243). ORRs were 8.8% in the tilsotolimod arm and 8.6% in the ipilimumab arm, with disease control rates of 34.5% and 27.2%, respectively. Median OS was 11.6 months in the tilsotolimod arm and 10 months in the ipilimumab arm (hazard ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.19]; P 5 .7). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 61.1% and 55.5% of patients in the tilsotolimod and ipilimumab arms, respectively. CONCLUSION Combining IT tilsotolimod with ipilimumab did not significantly improve the ORR or OS compared with ipilimumab alone in patients with anti–PD-1 advanced refractory melanoma.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105000354831&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.24.00727
DO - 10.1200/JCO.24.00727
M3 - Article
C2 - 40048691
AN - SCOPUS:105000354831
SN - 0732-183X
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
M1 - JCO.24.00727
ER -