TY - JOUR
T1 - Randomized phase II trial of gefitinib or gemcitabine or docetaxel chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and a performance status of 2 or 3 (IFCT-0301 study)
AU - Morère, Jean François
AU - Bréchot, Jeanne Marie
AU - Westeel, Virginie
AU - Gounant, Valerie
AU - Lebeau, Bernard
AU - Vaylet, Fabien
AU - Barlési, Fabrice
AU - Urban, Thierry
AU - Souquet, Pierre Jean
AU - Debieuvre, Didier
AU - Baudrin, Laurence
AU - Zalcman, Gérard
AU - Morin, Franck
AU - Milleron, Bernard
AU - Moro-Sibilot, Denis
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by AstraZeneca, Place Renault, Rueil Malmaison, France and by Sanofi Aventis, Quai de la Rapée, Paris, France.
PY - 2010/12/1
Y1 - 2010/12/1
N2 - Background: To compare 3 treatment strategies in chemotherapy naive patients with advanced NSCLC and a PS 2-3. Patients and Methods: Patients were assigned to gefitinib 250mg daily (n=43) or to gemcitabine (1250mg/m2 d 1, 8 q 21d) (n=42) or docetaxel (75mg/m2 d 1 q 21d) (n=42). Treatments were taken until progression or toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary end points were response and overall survival. Results: Disease control rates were 20.9%, 33.4% and 38.1%, respectively. Median PFS was 1.9 months in the gefitinib arm, 2.0 months in the gemcitabine arm and 2.0 months in the docetaxel arm (HR gemcitabine versus gefitinib: 0.74, 95%CI: [0.48; 1.16], HR docetaxel versus gefitinib: 0.67, 95%CI: [0.43; 1.05]). Median survival times were 2.2, 2.4 and 3.5 months, respectively (HR gemcitabine versus gefitinib: 0.76, 95%CI: [0.48; 1.20], HR docetaxel versus gefitinib: 0.69, 95%CI: [0.44; 1.09]). There were more grade 3-4 adverse events in the docetaxel arm when compared with either the gefitinib arm or the gemcitabine arm. Conclusion: In unselected NSCLC patients with PS 2-3, gefitinib, gemcitabine and docetaxel achieved similar results. Docetaxel was associated with higher rates of adverse events.
AB - Background: To compare 3 treatment strategies in chemotherapy naive patients with advanced NSCLC and a PS 2-3. Patients and Methods: Patients were assigned to gefitinib 250mg daily (n=43) or to gemcitabine (1250mg/m2 d 1, 8 q 21d) (n=42) or docetaxel (75mg/m2 d 1 q 21d) (n=42). Treatments were taken until progression or toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary end points were response and overall survival. Results: Disease control rates were 20.9%, 33.4% and 38.1%, respectively. Median PFS was 1.9 months in the gefitinib arm, 2.0 months in the gemcitabine arm and 2.0 months in the docetaxel arm (HR gemcitabine versus gefitinib: 0.74, 95%CI: [0.48; 1.16], HR docetaxel versus gefitinib: 0.67, 95%CI: [0.43; 1.05]). Median survival times were 2.2, 2.4 and 3.5 months, respectively (HR gemcitabine versus gefitinib: 0.76, 95%CI: [0.48; 1.20], HR docetaxel versus gefitinib: 0.69, 95%CI: [0.44; 1.09]). There were more grade 3-4 adverse events in the docetaxel arm when compared with either the gefitinib arm or the gemcitabine arm. Conclusion: In unselected NSCLC patients with PS 2-3, gefitinib, gemcitabine and docetaxel achieved similar results. Docetaxel was associated with higher rates of adverse events.
KW - Chemotherapy
KW - Gefitinib
KW - Lung cancer
KW - Performance status 3
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956805350&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.03.003
DO - 10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.03.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 20400201
AN - SCOPUS:77956805350
SN - 0169-5002
VL - 70
SP - 301
EP - 307
JO - Lung Cancer
JF - Lung Cancer
IS - 3
ER -