TY - JOUR
T1 - Randomized, phase III study of gemcitabine or erlotinib maintenance therapy versus observation,with predefined second-line treatment, after cisplatin-gemcitabine induction chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
AU - Pérol, Maurice
AU - Chouaid, Christos
AU - Pérol, David
AU - Barlési, Fabrice
AU - Gervais, Radj
AU - Westeel, Virginie
AU - Crequit, Jacky
AU - Léna, Hervé
AU - Vergnenègre, Alain
AU - Zalcman, Gérard
AU - Monnet, Isabelle
AU - Le Caer, Hervé
AU - Fournel, Pierre
AU - Falchero, Lionel
AU - Poudenx, Michel
AU - Vaylet, Fabien
AU - Ségura-Ferlay, Céline
AU - Devouassoux-Shisheboran, Mojgan
AU - Taron, Miquel
AU - Milleron, Bernard
PY - 2012/10/1
Y1 - 2012/10/1
N2 - Purpose: This phase III study investigated whether continuation maintenance with gemcitabine or switch maintenance with erlotinib improves clinical outcome compared with observation in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose disease was controlled after cisplatin-gemcitabine induction chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: Four hundred sixty-four patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC without tumor progression after four cycles of cisplatin-gemcitabine were randomly assigned to observation or to gemcitabine (1,250 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle) or daily erlotinib (150 mg/day) study arms. On disease progression, patients in all three arms received pemetrexed (500 mg/m2 once every 21 days) as predefined second-line therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: PFS was significantly prolonged by gemcitabine (median, 3.8 v 1.9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.56; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.72; log-rank P < .001) and erlotinib (median, 2.9 v 1.9 months; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.88; log-rank P = .003) versus observation; this benefit was consistent across all clinical subgroups. Both maintenance strategies resulted in a nonsignificant improvement in overall survival (OS); patients who received second-line pemetrexed or with a performance status of 0 appeared to derive greater benefit. Exploratory analysis showed that magnitude of response to induction chemotherapy may affect the OS benefit as a result of gemcitabine maintenance. Maintenance gemcitabine and erlotinib were well tolerated with no unexpected adverse events. Conclusion: Gemcitabine continuation maintenance or erlotinib switch maintenance significantly reduces disease progression in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with cisplatin-gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy. Response to induction chemotherapy may affect OS only for continuation maintenance.
AB - Purpose: This phase III study investigated whether continuation maintenance with gemcitabine or switch maintenance with erlotinib improves clinical outcome compared with observation in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose disease was controlled after cisplatin-gemcitabine induction chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: Four hundred sixty-four patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC without tumor progression after four cycles of cisplatin-gemcitabine were randomly assigned to observation or to gemcitabine (1,250 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle) or daily erlotinib (150 mg/day) study arms. On disease progression, patients in all three arms received pemetrexed (500 mg/m2 once every 21 days) as predefined second-line therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: PFS was significantly prolonged by gemcitabine (median, 3.8 v 1.9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.56; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.72; log-rank P < .001) and erlotinib (median, 2.9 v 1.9 months; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.88; log-rank P = .003) versus observation; this benefit was consistent across all clinical subgroups. Both maintenance strategies resulted in a nonsignificant improvement in overall survival (OS); patients who received second-line pemetrexed or with a performance status of 0 appeared to derive greater benefit. Exploratory analysis showed that magnitude of response to induction chemotherapy may affect the OS benefit as a result of gemcitabine maintenance. Maintenance gemcitabine and erlotinib were well tolerated with no unexpected adverse events. Conclusion: Gemcitabine continuation maintenance or erlotinib switch maintenance significantly reduces disease progression in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with cisplatin-gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy. Response to induction chemotherapy may affect OS only for continuation maintenance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867059528&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.9782
DO - 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.9782
M3 - Article
C2 - 22949150
AN - SCOPUS:84867059528
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 30
SP - 3516
EP - 3524
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 28
ER -