Results from the LIDO anemia survey: adherence to EORTC guidelines in cancer patients in France

Vincent Launay-Vacher, Nicolas Janus, Gilbert Deray, Florian Scotté

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

Résumé

Purpose: The aim of the LIDOanemia surveys was to assess how anemia in cancer patients is managed by oncologists and hematologists according to the key messages of the EORTC guidelines. Methods: LIDO 1 and LIDO 2 (Leaning upon International Directives for Optimization: Anemia) were declarative web-based surveys conducted in France. LIDO 1 specifically focused on clinical features triggering the decision to treat anemia, biological indicators of anemia, the hemoglobin (Hb) threshold for initiating treatment and blood transfusion, and the Hb treatment target. In LIDO 2, participants were presented the main messages of the EORTC guidelines and were asked four questions to assess the impact of the guideline’s broadcast on their practice. Results: A total of 133 and 319 physicians took part in the LIDO 1 and 2 surveys, respectively. The majority were oncologists (65 and 61 %, respectively). Responses from LIDO 1 showed practice habits that differed from those recommended in the EORTC guidelines. However, LIDO 2 showed that an average of 18 % of the participating physicians were willing to amend their clinical practice after receiving a summary of the EORTC recommendations for anemia management. Conclusion: These findings raise the questions of how often and how to most effectively disseminate key guideline messages. With the best interests of patients in mind, the ultimate objective is to improve the understanding of consensus recommendations and to close the gap between them and actual clinical practice.

langue originaleAnglais
Pages (de - à)3347-3351
Nombre de pages5
journalSupportive Care in Cancer
Volume24
Numéro de publication8
Les DOIs
étatPublié - 1 août 2016
Modification externeOui

Contient cette citation