TY - JOUR
T1 - Robotic-assisted CT-guided percutaneous thermal ablation of abdominal tumors
T2 - An analysis of 41 patients
AU - Bonnet, Baptiste
AU - de Baère, Thierry
AU - Beunon, Paul
AU - Feddal, Adlane
AU - Tselikas, Lambros
AU - Deschamps, Frédéric
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/6/1
Y1 - 2024/6/1
N2 - Purpose: Robotic assistance is rapidly evolving and may help physicians optimize needle guidance during percutaneous interventions. The purpose of the study was to report feasibility, safety, accuracy, immediate clinical success and short-term local tumor control after robotic-assisted computed tomography (CT)-guided thermal ablation of abdominal tumors. Materials and methods: Forty-one patients who underwent percutaneous thermal ablation of abdominal tumors using robotic-assisted CT-guided were included. All ablations were performed with robotic assistance, using an optically-monitored robotic system with a needle guide sent to preplanned trajectories defined on three-dimensional-volumetric CT acquisitions with respiration monitoring. Endpoints were technical success, safety, distance from needle tip to planned trajectory and number of needle adjustments, and complete ablation rate. Results: Forty-one patients (31 men; mean age, 66.7 ± 9.9 [standard deviation (SD)] years [age range: 41–84 years]) were treated for 48 abdominal tumors, with 79 planned needles. Lesions treated were located in the liver (23/41; 56%), kidney (14/41;34%), adrenal gland (3/41; 7%) or retroperitoneum (1/41; 2%). Technical success was achieved in 39/41 (95%) patients, and 76/79 (96%) needle insertions. The mean lateral distance between the needle tip and planned trajectory was 3.2 ± 4.5 (SD) mm (range: 0–20 mm) before adjustments, and the mean three-dimensional distance was 1.6 ± 2.6 (SD) mm (range: 0–13 mm) after 29 manual depth adjustments (29/78; 37%) and 33 lateral adjustments (33/78; 42%). Two (2/79; 3%) needles required complete manual reinsertion. One grade 3 complication was reported in one patient (1/41; 2%). The overall clinical success rate was 100%. The 3-month local tumor control rate (progression free survival) was 95% (38/41). Conclusion: These results provide further evidence on the use of robotic-assisted needle insertion regarding feasibility, safety, and accuracy, resulting in effective percutaneous thermal ablation of abdominal tumors.
AB - Purpose: Robotic assistance is rapidly evolving and may help physicians optimize needle guidance during percutaneous interventions. The purpose of the study was to report feasibility, safety, accuracy, immediate clinical success and short-term local tumor control after robotic-assisted computed tomography (CT)-guided thermal ablation of abdominal tumors. Materials and methods: Forty-one patients who underwent percutaneous thermal ablation of abdominal tumors using robotic-assisted CT-guided were included. All ablations were performed with robotic assistance, using an optically-monitored robotic system with a needle guide sent to preplanned trajectories defined on three-dimensional-volumetric CT acquisitions with respiration monitoring. Endpoints were technical success, safety, distance from needle tip to planned trajectory and number of needle adjustments, and complete ablation rate. Results: Forty-one patients (31 men; mean age, 66.7 ± 9.9 [standard deviation (SD)] years [age range: 41–84 years]) were treated for 48 abdominal tumors, with 79 planned needles. Lesions treated were located in the liver (23/41; 56%), kidney (14/41;34%), adrenal gland (3/41; 7%) or retroperitoneum (1/41; 2%). Technical success was achieved in 39/41 (95%) patients, and 76/79 (96%) needle insertions. The mean lateral distance between the needle tip and planned trajectory was 3.2 ± 4.5 (SD) mm (range: 0–20 mm) before adjustments, and the mean three-dimensional distance was 1.6 ± 2.6 (SD) mm (range: 0–13 mm) after 29 manual depth adjustments (29/78; 37%) and 33 lateral adjustments (33/78; 42%). Two (2/79; 3%) needles required complete manual reinsertion. One grade 3 complication was reported in one patient (1/41; 2%). The overall clinical success rate was 100%. The 3-month local tumor control rate (progression free survival) was 95% (38/41). Conclusion: These results provide further evidence on the use of robotic-assisted needle insertion regarding feasibility, safety, and accuracy, resulting in effective percutaneous thermal ablation of abdominal tumors.
KW - Abdominal neoplasms
KW - CT-guided procedures
KW - Feasibility studies
KW - Percutaneous thermal ablation
KW - Robotic procedures
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85185613588&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.diii.2024.01.005
DO - 10.1016/j.diii.2024.01.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 38368177
AN - SCOPUS:85185613588
SN - 2211-5684
VL - 105
SP - 227
EP - 232
JO - Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging
JF - Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging
IS - 6
ER -