TY - JOUR
T1 - Robotic prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction
T2 - A prospective study of 138 procedures
AU - Sanson, Claire
AU - Roulot, Aurélie
AU - Honart, Jean François
AU - Rimareix, Françoise
AU - Leymarie, Nicolas
AU - Sarfati, Benjamin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Editura Celsius. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/4/1
Y1 - 2021/4/1
N2 - Background- Robotic breast surgery is an emergent procedure with encouraging preliminary results. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and the safety of robotic nipple sparing mastectomy (RNSM) with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction (IPBR). Methods This is a prospective study including from December 2015 to January 2020 all RNSM surgeries with IPBR, in patients with moderate ptosis and A B or C cup. The primary endpoint was the rate of major necrosis. Secondary endpoints were conversion rate, postoperative complications (infections, hematoma, implant exposure), aesthetic results and quality of life. Results'- 79 patients underwent 138 RNSM with IPBR. The average follow-up was 28 months. 2 procedures required conversion. Two cases of major necrosis occurred (1.4%). 9 surgical site infec¬tions were observed (6.5%), 4 infections could be treated with implant replacement. Unfortunately 5 others resulted in implant loss. 4 other implant losses occurred: 2 due to major necrosis, and 2 due to periprosthetic capsula. In total, 9 implants were lost (6.5%). Esthetical results were mostly very satisfying and quality of life was not affected by the mastectomy. Conclusions'- RSNM with IPBR was associated with low rates of major necrosis. It is a safe and reproducible procedure that allows breast reconstruction without visible scar.
AB - Background- Robotic breast surgery is an emergent procedure with encouraging preliminary results. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and the safety of robotic nipple sparing mastectomy (RNSM) with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction (IPBR). Methods This is a prospective study including from December 2015 to January 2020 all RNSM surgeries with IPBR, in patients with moderate ptosis and A B or C cup. The primary endpoint was the rate of major necrosis. Secondary endpoints were conversion rate, postoperative complications (infections, hematoma, implant exposure), aesthetic results and quality of life. Results'- 79 patients underwent 138 RNSM with IPBR. The average follow-up was 28 months. 2 procedures required conversion. Two cases of major necrosis occurred (1.4%). 9 surgical site infec¬tions were observed (6.5%), 4 infections could be treated with implant replacement. Unfortunately 5 others resulted in implant loss. 4 other implant losses occurred: 2 due to major necrosis, and 2 due to periprosthetic capsula. In total, 9 implants were lost (6.5%). Esthetical results were mostly very satisfying and quality of life was not affected by the mastectomy. Conclusions'- RSNM with IPBR was associated with low rates of major necrosis. It is a safe and reproducible procedure that allows breast reconstruction without visible scar.
KW - Breast reconstruction
KW - Minimal invasive surgery
KW - Nipple-sparing mastectomy
KW - Prophylactic surgery
KW - Robotic mastectomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105519808&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.21614/CHIRURGIA.116.2.135
DO - 10.21614/CHIRURGIA.116.2.135
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33950808
AN - SCOPUS:85105519808
SN - 1221-9118
VL - 116
SP - 135
EP - 142
JO - Chirurgia (Romania)
JF - Chirurgia (Romania)
IS - 2
ER -