Rucaparib or Physician's Choice in Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Karim Fizazi, Josep M. Piulats, M. Neil Reaume, Peter Ostler, Ray Mcdermott, Joel R. Gingerich, Elias Pintus, Srikala S. Sridhar, Richard M. Bambury, Urban Emmenegger, Henriette Lindberg, David Morris, Franco Nolè, John Staffurth, Charles Redfern, María I. Sáez, Wassim Abida, Gedske Daugaard, Axel Heidenreich, Laurence KriegerBrieuc Sautois, Andrea Loehr, Darrin Despain, Catherine A. Heyes, Simon P. Watkins, Simon Chowdhury, Charles J. Ryan, Alan H. Bryce

    Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

    175 Citations (Scopus)

    Résumé

    Background: In a phase 2 study, rucaparib, an inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), showed a high level of activity in patients who had metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer associated with a deleterious BRCA alteration. Data are needed to confirm and expand on the findings of the phase 2 study. Methods: In this randomized, controlled, phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients who had metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer with a BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM alteration and who had disease progression after treatment with a second-generation androgen-receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI). We randomly assigned the patients in a 2:1 ratio to receive oral rucaparib (600 mg twice daily) or a physician's choice control (docetaxel or a second-generation ARPI [abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide]). The primary outcome was the median duration of imaging-based progression-free survival according to independent review. Results: Of the 4855 patients who had undergone prescreening or screening, 270 were assigned to receive rucaparib and 135 to receive a control medication (intention-to-treat population); in the two groups, 201 patients and 101 patients, respectively, had a BRCA alteration. At 62 months, the duration of imaging-based progression-free survival was significantly longer in the rucaparib group than in the control group, both in the BRCA subgroup (median, 11.2 months and 6.4 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36 to 0.69) and in the intention-to-treat group (median, 10.2 months and 6.4 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.80; P<0.001 for both comparisons). In an exploratory analysis in the ATM subgroup, the median duration of imaging-based progression-free survival was 8.1 months in the rucaparib group and 6.8 months in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.52). The most frequent adverse events with rucaparib were fatigue and nausea. Conclusions: The duration of imaging-based progression-free survival was significantly longer with rucaparib than with a control medication among patients who had metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer with a BRCA alteration.

    langue originaleAnglais
    Pages (de - à)719-732
    Nombre de pages14
    journalNew England Journal of Medicine
    Volume388
    Numéro de publication8
    Les DOIs
    étatPublié - 1 janv. 2023

    Contient cette citation