TY - JOUR
T1 - Rural residency and prostate cancer specific mortality
T2 - Results from the Victorian Radical Prostatectomy Register
AU - Papa, Nathan
AU - Lawrentschuk, Nathan
AU - Muller, David
AU - Macinnis, Robert
AU - Ta, Anthony
AU - Severi, Gianluca
AU - Millar, Jeremy
AU - Syme, Rodney
AU - Giles, Graham
AU - Bolton, Damien
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Public Health Association of Australia.
PY - 2014/10/1
Y1 - 2014/10/1
N2 - Methods: Men who underwent open radical prostatectomy (RP) in Victoria from 1995 to 2000 were recorded in a population register co-ordinated by the Victorian Cancer Registry and Cancer Council Victoria. Baseline clinical, pathological and demographic information such as location were recorded and linked to mortality and recurrence data. Men who had neoadjuvant therapy or missing data for socioeconomic status (SES), tumour grade and stage were excluded leaving 1984 patients in the analyses (92.1% of total register).Objective: To present long-term survival data from the Victorian Radical Prostatectomy Register (VRPR), 1995-2000, and analyse the effect of rural residence on survival.Results: Follow-up concluded in 2009 with 238 deaths observed, of which 77 were prostate cancer (PCa) specific. Cox and competing risk regressions were used for analysis. Living in a rural area was associated with higher odds of PCa specific mortality after RP (trend p<0.001) and a higher hazard of PCa death, the discrepancy rising up to four-fold (SHR=4.09, p=0.004) with increasing remoteness of residence. This effect is apparent after adjustment for SES, age, private or public hospital treatment, PSA level and tumour-specific factors.Conclusion: Rural men in Victoria have a shorter time to PCa death following definitive treatment, even after adjustment for SES and adverse tumour characteristics. Implication: Rural men are faring worse than their urban counterparts following the same cancer treatment.
AB - Methods: Men who underwent open radical prostatectomy (RP) in Victoria from 1995 to 2000 were recorded in a population register co-ordinated by the Victorian Cancer Registry and Cancer Council Victoria. Baseline clinical, pathological and demographic information such as location were recorded and linked to mortality and recurrence data. Men who had neoadjuvant therapy or missing data for socioeconomic status (SES), tumour grade and stage were excluded leaving 1984 patients in the analyses (92.1% of total register).Objective: To present long-term survival data from the Victorian Radical Prostatectomy Register (VRPR), 1995-2000, and analyse the effect of rural residence on survival.Results: Follow-up concluded in 2009 with 238 deaths observed, of which 77 were prostate cancer (PCa) specific. Cox and competing risk regressions were used for analysis. Living in a rural area was associated with higher odds of PCa specific mortality after RP (trend p<0.001) and a higher hazard of PCa death, the discrepancy rising up to four-fold (SHR=4.09, p=0.004) with increasing remoteness of residence. This effect is apparent after adjustment for SES, age, private or public hospital treatment, PSA level and tumour-specific factors.Conclusion: Rural men in Victoria have a shorter time to PCa death following definitive treatment, even after adjustment for SES and adverse tumour characteristics. Implication: Rural men are faring worse than their urban counterparts following the same cancer treatment.
KW - population study
KW - prostate cancer
KW - rural health
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908219474&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1753-6405.12210
DO - 10.1111/1753-6405.12210
M3 - Article
C2 - 24962513
AN - SCOPUS:84908219474
SN - 1326-0200
VL - 38
SP - 449
EP - 454
JO - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
JF - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
IS - 5
ER -