Safety and clinical activity of atezolizumab in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A phase i study

Daniel P. Petrylak, Yohann Loriot, David R. Shaffer, Fadi Braiteh, John Powderly, Lauren C. Harshman, Paul Conkling, Jean Pierre Delord, Michael Gordon, Joseph W. Kim, Indrani Sarkar, Kobe Yuen, Edward E. Kadel, Sanjeev Mariathasan, Carol O'Hear, Sujata Narayanan, Marcella Fasso, Susheela Carroll, Thomas Powles

    Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

    50 Citations (Scopus)

    Résumé

    Purpose: Atezolizumab [anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (anti- PD-L1)] is well tolerated and efficacious in multiple cancers, but has not been previously evaluated in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This study examined the safety, efficacy, and biomarkers of atezolizumab monotherapy for mCRPC. Patients and Methods: This phase Ia, open-label, doseescalation and dose-expansion study (PCD4989g) enrolled patients with mCRPC who had progressed on sipuleucel-T or enzalutamide. Atezolizumab was given intravenously every 3 weeks until confirmed disease progression or loss of clinical benefit. Prespecified endpoints included safety, efficacy, biomarker analyses, and radiographic assessments. Results: All 35 evaluable patients [median age, 68 years (range, 45- 83 years)] received atezolizumab after ≥1 prior line of therapy; 62.9% of patients had received ≥3 prior lines. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 21 patients (60.0%), with no deaths. One patient had a confirmed partial response (PR) per RECIST 1.1, and 1 patient had a PR per immune-related response criteria. The confirmed 50% PSAresponse ratewas 8.6%(3 patients).Median overall survival (OS) was 14.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 5.9-not evaluable], with a 1-year OS rate of 52.3% (95% CI: 34-70); 2-year OS was 35.9% (95% CI: 13-59). Median follow-up was 13.0 months (range, 1.2- 28.1 months). Biomarker analyses showed that atezolizumab activated immune responses; however, a composite biomarker failed to reveal consistent correlations with efficacy. Conclusions: Atezolizumab was generally well tolerated in patients with mCRPC, with a safety profile consistent with other tumor types. In heavily pretreated patients, atezolizumab monotherapy demonstrated evidence of disease control; however, its limited efficacy suggests a combination approach may be needed.

    langue originaleAnglais
    Pages (de - à)3360-3369
    Nombre de pages10
    journalClinical Cancer Research
    Volume27
    Numéro de publication12
    Les DOIs
    étatPublié - 1 juin 2021

    Contient cette citation