Screening Mammography and Breast Cancer: Variation in Risk with Rare Deleterious or Predicted Deleterious Variants in DNA Repair Genes

Maximiliano Ribeiro-Guerra, Marie Gabrielle Dondon, Séverine Eon-Marchais, Dorothée Le Gal, Juana Beauvallet, Noura Mebirouk, Muriel Belotti, Eve Cavaciuti, Claude Adenis-Lavignasse, Séverine Audebert-Bellanger, Pascaline Berthet, Valérie Bonadona, Bruno Buecher, Olivier Caron, Mathias Cavaille, Jean Chiesa, Chrystelle Colas, Isabelle Coupier, Capucine Delnatte, Hélène DreyfusAnne Fajac, Sandra Fert-Ferrer, Jean Pierre Fricker, Marion Gauthier-Villars, Paul Gesta, Sophie Giraud, Laurence Gladieff, Christine Lasset, Sophie Lejeune-Dumoulin, Jean Marc Limacher, Michel Longy, Alain Lortholary, Elisabeth Luporsi, Christine M. Maugard, Isabelle Mortemousque, Sophie Nambot, Catherine Noguès, Pascal Pujol, Laurence Venat-Bouvet, Florent Soubrier, Julie Tinat, Anne Tardivon, Fabienne Lesueur, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Nadine Andrieu

    Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

    Résumé

    Background: Women with a familial predisposition to breast cancer (BC) are offered screening at earlier ages and more frequently than women from the general population. Methods: We evaluated the effect of screening mammography in 1552 BC cases with a hereditary predisposition to BC unexplained by BRCA1 or BRCA2 and 1363 unrelated controls. Participants reported their lifetime mammography exposures in a detailed questionnaire. Germline rare deleterious or predicted deleterious variants (D-PDVs) in 113 DNA repair genes were investigated in 82.5% of the women and classified according to the strength of their association with BC. Genes with an odds ratio (OR) < 0.9 was assigned to the Gene Group “Reduced”, those with OR ≥ 0.9 and ≤1.1 to Group “Independent”, and those with OR > 1.1 to Group “Increased”. Results: Overall, having been exposed to mammograms (never vs. ever) was not associated with BC risk. However, an increase in BC risk of 4% (95% CI: 1–6%) per additional exposure was found under the assumption of linearity. When grouped according to D-PDV carrier status, mammograms doubled the BC risk of women carrying a D-PDV in Group “Reduced”, as compared to those carrying a D-PDV in Group “Increased”. Conclusions: Our study is the first to investigate the joint effect of mammogram exposure and variants in DNA repair genes other than BRCA1 and BRCA2 in women at high risk of BC; therefore, further studies are needed to verify our findings. Even though mammographic screening reduces the risk of mortality from BC, the identification of populations that are more or less susceptible to ionizing radiation may be clinically relevant.

    langue originaleAnglais
    Numéro d'article1062
    journalCancers
    Volume17
    Numéro de publication7
    Les DOIs
    étatPublié - 1 avr. 2025

    Contient cette citation