TY - JOUR
T1 - Screening Mammography and Breast Cancer
T2 - Variation in Risk with Rare Deleterious or Predicted Deleterious Variants in DNA Repair Genes
AU - Ribeiro-Guerra, Maximiliano
AU - Dondon, Marie Gabrielle
AU - Eon-Marchais, Séverine
AU - Le Gal, Dorothée
AU - Beauvallet, Juana
AU - Mebirouk, Noura
AU - Belotti, Muriel
AU - Cavaciuti, Eve
AU - Adenis-Lavignasse, Claude
AU - Audebert-Bellanger, Séverine
AU - Berthet, Pascaline
AU - Bonadona, Valérie
AU - Buecher, Bruno
AU - Caron, Olivier
AU - Cavaille, Mathias
AU - Chiesa, Jean
AU - Colas, Chrystelle
AU - Coupier, Isabelle
AU - Delnatte, Capucine
AU - Dreyfus, Hélène
AU - Fajac, Anne
AU - Fert-Ferrer, Sandra
AU - Fricker, Jean Pierre
AU - Gauthier-Villars, Marion
AU - Gesta, Paul
AU - Giraud, Sophie
AU - Gladieff, Laurence
AU - Lasset, Christine
AU - Lejeune-Dumoulin, Sophie
AU - Limacher, Jean Marc
AU - Longy, Michel
AU - Lortholary, Alain
AU - Luporsi, Elisabeth
AU - Maugard, Christine M.
AU - Mortemousque, Isabelle
AU - Nambot, Sophie
AU - Noguès, Catherine
AU - Pujol, Pascal
AU - Venat-Bouvet, Laurence
AU - Soubrier, Florent
AU - Tinat, Julie
AU - Tardivon, Anne
AU - Lesueur, Fabienne
AU - Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique
AU - Andrieu, Nadine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025/4/1
Y1 - 2025/4/1
N2 - Background: Women with a familial predisposition to breast cancer (BC) are offered screening at earlier ages and more frequently than women from the general population. Methods: We evaluated the effect of screening mammography in 1552 BC cases with a hereditary predisposition to BC unexplained by BRCA1 or BRCA2 and 1363 unrelated controls. Participants reported their lifetime mammography exposures in a detailed questionnaire. Germline rare deleterious or predicted deleterious variants (D-PDVs) in 113 DNA repair genes were investigated in 82.5% of the women and classified according to the strength of their association with BC. Genes with an odds ratio (OR) < 0.9 was assigned to the Gene Group “Reduced”, those with OR ≥ 0.9 and ≤1.1 to Group “Independent”, and those with OR > 1.1 to Group “Increased”. Results: Overall, having been exposed to mammograms (never vs. ever) was not associated with BC risk. However, an increase in BC risk of 4% (95% CI: 1–6%) per additional exposure was found under the assumption of linearity. When grouped according to D-PDV carrier status, mammograms doubled the BC risk of women carrying a D-PDV in Group “Reduced”, as compared to those carrying a D-PDV in Group “Increased”. Conclusions: Our study is the first to investigate the joint effect of mammogram exposure and variants in DNA repair genes other than BRCA1 and BRCA2 in women at high risk of BC; therefore, further studies are needed to verify our findings. Even though mammographic screening reduces the risk of mortality from BC, the identification of populations that are more or less susceptible to ionizing radiation may be clinically relevant.
AB - Background: Women with a familial predisposition to breast cancer (BC) are offered screening at earlier ages and more frequently than women from the general population. Methods: We evaluated the effect of screening mammography in 1552 BC cases with a hereditary predisposition to BC unexplained by BRCA1 or BRCA2 and 1363 unrelated controls. Participants reported their lifetime mammography exposures in a detailed questionnaire. Germline rare deleterious or predicted deleterious variants (D-PDVs) in 113 DNA repair genes were investigated in 82.5% of the women and classified according to the strength of their association with BC. Genes with an odds ratio (OR) < 0.9 was assigned to the Gene Group “Reduced”, those with OR ≥ 0.9 and ≤1.1 to Group “Independent”, and those with OR > 1.1 to Group “Increased”. Results: Overall, having been exposed to mammograms (never vs. ever) was not associated with BC risk. However, an increase in BC risk of 4% (95% CI: 1–6%) per additional exposure was found under the assumption of linearity. When grouped according to D-PDV carrier status, mammograms doubled the BC risk of women carrying a D-PDV in Group “Reduced”, as compared to those carrying a D-PDV in Group “Increased”. Conclusions: Our study is the first to investigate the joint effect of mammogram exposure and variants in DNA repair genes other than BRCA1 and BRCA2 in women at high risk of BC; therefore, further studies are needed to verify our findings. Even though mammographic screening reduces the risk of mortality from BC, the identification of populations that are more or less susceptible to ionizing radiation may be clinically relevant.
KW - DNA repair genes
KW - breast cancer
KW - high-risk population
KW - mammography screening
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105002607456&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/cancers17071062
DO - 10.3390/cancers17071062
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105002607456
SN - 2072-6694
VL - 17
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
IS - 7
M1 - 1062
ER -