Second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review

Fabrice Barlési, William Jacot, Philippe Astoul, Jean Louis Pujol

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticle 'review'Revue par des pairs

51 Citations (Scopus)

Résumé

Background: Among advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, most will resist or relapse after first-line chemotherapy. As a result, second-line therapy has been a major focus for clinical research. Materials and methods: A systematic review was carried out from 1996 to February 2005. Results: Second-line chemotherapy provides pre-treated NSCLC patients with a clear survival advantage. Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks is the present standard second-line chemotherapy. Despite promising results regarding efficacy and toxicity in phase III studies, a docetaxel weekly schedule could not be recommended. Pemetrexed recently emerged as an alternative with similar efficacy and less toxicity. Although the combination of two drugs was not associated with a survival benefit when compared with single-agent chemotherapy, such regimens induced a dramatic increase in toxicities and therefore mono-chemotherapy remains the standard as second-line therapy. Finally, few new agents were reported with better results than those used previously and clinical research on second-line therapy currently focuses on combinations with targeted therapies. Conclusion: Second-line chemotherapy offers NSCLC patients a small but significant survival improvement. However, this field of clinical research needs further investigations in order to answer certain remaining questions especially concerning targeted therapies.

langue originaleAnglais
Pages (de - à)159-172
Nombre de pages14
journalLung Cancer
Volume51
Numéro de publication2
Les DOIs
étatPublié - 1 févr. 2006
Modification externeOui

Contient cette citation