TY - JOUR
T1 - State of the art and the future of microbiome-based biomarkers
T2 - a multidisciplinary Delphi consensus
AU - Human Microbiome Action consortium
AU - Rodriguez, Julie
AU - Hassani, Zahra
AU - Alves Costa Silva, Carolina
AU - Betsou, Fay
AU - Carraturo, Federica
AU - Fasano, Alessio
AU - Israelsen, Mads
AU - Iyappan, Anandhi
AU - Krag, Aleksander
AU - Metwaly, Amira
AU - Schierwagen, Robert
AU - Trebicka, Jonel
AU - Zwart, Hub
AU - Doré, Joel
AU - Cordaillat-Simmons, Magali
AU - Druart, Celine
AU - Godoy, Yolanda
AU - Bork, Peer
AU - Typas, Nassos
AU - Hazenbrink, Dienty Hendrina Maria Johanna
AU - Zitvogel, Laurence
AU - Derosa, Lisa
AU - Blottière, Hervé
AU - Kriaa, Aicha
AU - Maguin, Emmanuelle
AU - Rhimi, Moez
AU - Veiga, Patrick
AU - Pons, Nicolas
AU - Prost, Pierre Louis
AU - Jarde, Alexander
AU - Boutron, Isabelle
AU - Ravaud, Philippe
AU - Falk Villesen, Ida
AU - Haller, Dirk
AU - Ross, Paul
AU - O'Toole, Paul
AU - Lavelle, Aonghus
AU - Claesson, Marcus
AU - Joos, Raphaela
AU - Hill, Colin
AU - Shkoporov, Andrey
AU - Loftus, Saba
AU - Boucher, Katy
AU - Arumugam, Manimozhayan
AU - Sarathi, Arjun
AU - Morozova, Vitalina
AU - Segata, Nicola
AU - Asnicar, Francesco
AU - Pinto, Federica
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s)
PY - 2024/1/1
Y1 - 2024/1/1
N2 - Although microbiome signatures have been identified in various contexts (ie, pathogenesis of non-communicable diseases and treatment response), qualified microbiome-based biomarkers are currently not in use in clinical practice. The Human Microbiome Action consortium initiated a Delphi survey to establish a consensus on the needs, challenges, and limitations in developing qualified microbiome-based biomarkers. The questionnaire was developed by a scientific committee via literature review and expert interviews. To ensure broad applicability of the results, 307 experts were invited to participate; 114 of them responded to the first round of the survey, 93 of whom completed the second and final round as well. The survey highlighted the experts’ confidence in the potential of microbiome-based biomarkers for several indications or pathologies. The paucity of validated analytical methods appears to be the principal factor hindering the qualification of these biomarkers. The survey also showed that clinical implementation of these biomarkers would only be possible if kitted and validated molecular assays with simple interpretation are developed. This initiative serves as a foundation for designing and implementing public-private collaborative projects to overcome the challenges and promote clinical application of microbiome-based biomarkers.
AB - Although microbiome signatures have been identified in various contexts (ie, pathogenesis of non-communicable diseases and treatment response), qualified microbiome-based biomarkers are currently not in use in clinical practice. The Human Microbiome Action consortium initiated a Delphi survey to establish a consensus on the needs, challenges, and limitations in developing qualified microbiome-based biomarkers. The questionnaire was developed by a scientific committee via literature review and expert interviews. To ensure broad applicability of the results, 307 experts were invited to participate; 114 of them responded to the first round of the survey, 93 of whom completed the second and final round as well. The survey highlighted the experts’ confidence in the potential of microbiome-based biomarkers for several indications or pathologies. The paucity of validated analytical methods appears to be the principal factor hindering the qualification of these biomarkers. The survey also showed that clinical implementation of these biomarkers would only be possible if kitted and validated molecular assays with simple interpretation are developed. This initiative serves as a foundation for designing and implementing public-private collaborative projects to overcome the challenges and promote clinical application of microbiome-based biomarkers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203047983&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.07.011
DO - 10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.07.011
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85203047983
SN - 2666-5247
JO - The Lancet Microbe
JF - The Lancet Microbe
M1 - 100948
ER -