Supra-tentorial Ependymomas with ZFTA Fusion, YAP1 Fusion, and Astroblastomas, MN1-altered: Characteristic Imaging Features

Victoire Perrod, Raphael Levy, Arnault Tauziède-Espariat, Charles Joris Roux, Kevin Beccaria, Thomas Blauwblomme, Jacques Grill, Christelle Dufour, Léa Guerrini-Rousseau, Samuel Abbou, Stéphanie Bolle, Alexandre Roux, Johan Pallud, Corentin Provost, Catherine Oppenheim, Pascale Varlet, Nathalie Boddaert, Volodia Dangouloff-Ros

    Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

    Résumé

    Purpose: Supratentorial (ST) ependymoma subgroups are defined by two different fusions with different prognoses. Astroblastomas, MN1-altered, have ependymal-like histopathologic features and represent a differential diagnosis in children. We hypothesized that ZFTA-fused ependymoma and YAP1-fused ependymoma on the one hand, and astroblastoma, MN1-altered, on the other hand, show different MRI characteristics. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the preoperative imaging of 45 patients with ST ependymoma or astroblastoma between January 2000 and September 2020, blinded to histomolecular grouping. Several characteristics, such as location, tumor volume, calcifications, solid/cystic component, and signal enhancement or diffusion were evaluated. We compared imaging characteristics according to their molecular subtype (ZFTA-fused, YAP1-fused, and astroblastoma, MN1-altered). Results: Thirty-nine patients were classified as having an ependymoma, 35 with a ZFTA fusion and four with a YAP1 fusion, and six as having an astroblastoma, MN1-altered. YAP1-fused ependymomas were more likely to involve at least 3 lobes than ZFTA-fused ependymomas. Astroblastomas were located in the frontal lobe in 100% of the tumors versus 49% of the ependymomas. Cerebral blood flow by arterial spin labeling was higher in astroblastomas than in ependymomas. There were no differences in the other characteristics between the molecular groups. All the tumors showed common features: intra-axial extra-ventricular tumors, very frequent contrast enhancement (39/43, 91%), a cystic/necrotic component (41/45, 91%), restricted diffusion (32/36, 89%), calcifications (15/18, 83%), and peri-tumoral edema (38/44, 86%). Conclusion: The distinction between ST ependymoma subtypes and astroblastomas can be guided by several imaging features. These tumors share common imaging features that may help to differentiate ST ependymomas and astroblastomas from other pediatric ST tumors.

    langue originaleAnglais
    Pages (de - à)939-950
    Nombre de pages12
    journalClinical Neuroradiology
    Volume34
    Numéro de publication4
    Les DOIs
    étatPublié - 1 déc. 2024

    Contient cette citation