TY - JOUR
T1 - Surgical cervicothoracic-flap repair of neoesophagus–airway fistula after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
T2 - A retrospective cohort study
AU - Bertrand, Thibaud
AU - Mercier, Olaf
AU - Leymarie, Nicolas
AU - Issard, Justin
AU - Honart, Jean François
AU - Fabre, Dominique
AU - Kolb, Frédéric
AU - Fadel, Elie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2024/2/1
Y1 - 2024/2/1
N2 - Objective: To evaluate outcomes of surgical repair of postesophagectomy neoesophagus–airway fistulas (NEAFs). Methods: We retrospectively included consecutive patients with NEAF managed by various techniques at our center between August 2009 and July 2021. Result: Of the 11 patients (median age, 60 years; interquartile range, 58, 62), 4 had received induction chemoradiotherapy and 4 others induction chemotherapy. NEAF was mainly a complication of anastomotic leakage (n = 6) or attempted stenosis treatment (n = 3). The airway mainly involved was the trachea (n = 8). Airway defects were repaired by resection–anastomosis (n = 5), perforator flaps (n = 4), pedicled pericardium (n = 1), and/or direct suturing (n = 2). Gastric conduit defects were repaired by perforator flaps (n = 6), direct suturing (n = 2), or pedicled pericardium (n = 1). Of the 7 perforator flaps, 4 were internal mammary–artery, two dorsal intercostal–artery, and one supraclavicular–artery flaps. After a median follow-up of 100 months, 2 patients died on early postoperative course from NEAF repair failure and 3 from late NEAF recurrence at 4, 11, and 33 months. Among the remaining 6 patients, 1 died from local tumoral recurrence at 13 months, 1 was last on follow-up at 27 months, alive and eating normally. The other 4 were free from NEAF recurrence and dysphagia or swallowing disorder at 50 months’ follow-up. These 4 results were obtained thanks to perforator flap interposition and airway resection anastomosis. Conclusions: Surgical NEAF repair using perforator flap interposition may provide satisfactory long-term function after strong prehabilitation.
AB - Objective: To evaluate outcomes of surgical repair of postesophagectomy neoesophagus–airway fistulas (NEAFs). Methods: We retrospectively included consecutive patients with NEAF managed by various techniques at our center between August 2009 and July 2021. Result: Of the 11 patients (median age, 60 years; interquartile range, 58, 62), 4 had received induction chemoradiotherapy and 4 others induction chemotherapy. NEAF was mainly a complication of anastomotic leakage (n = 6) or attempted stenosis treatment (n = 3). The airway mainly involved was the trachea (n = 8). Airway defects were repaired by resection–anastomosis (n = 5), perforator flaps (n = 4), pedicled pericardium (n = 1), and/or direct suturing (n = 2). Gastric conduit defects were repaired by perforator flaps (n = 6), direct suturing (n = 2), or pedicled pericardium (n = 1). Of the 7 perforator flaps, 4 were internal mammary–artery, two dorsal intercostal–artery, and one supraclavicular–artery flaps. After a median follow-up of 100 months, 2 patients died on early postoperative course from NEAF repair failure and 3 from late NEAF recurrence at 4, 11, and 33 months. Among the remaining 6 patients, 1 died from local tumoral recurrence at 13 months, 1 was last on follow-up at 27 months, alive and eating normally. The other 4 were free from NEAF recurrence and dysphagia or swallowing disorder at 50 months’ follow-up. These 4 results were obtained thanks to perforator flap interposition and airway resection anastomosis. Conclusions: Surgical NEAF repair using perforator flap interposition may provide satisfactory long-term function after strong prehabilitation.
KW - airway-gastric fistula
KW - bronchial gastric fistula
KW - bronchio-esophageal fistula
KW - esophageal cancer
KW - esophagectomy
KW - gastrotracheal fistula
KW - thoracogastric-airway fistula
KW - tracheal stent
KW - tracheobronchial fistula
KW - tracheogastric fistula
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85179100154&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.xjtc.2023.10.027
DO - 10.1016/j.xjtc.2023.10.027
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85179100154
SN - 2666-2507
VL - 23
SP - 123
EP - 131
JO - JTCVS Techniques
JF - JTCVS Techniques
ER -