TY - JOUR
T1 - Targeted therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer - An example of personalised medicine in action
AU - Heinemann, V.
AU - Douillard, J. Y.
AU - Ducreux, M.
AU - Peeters, M.
N1 - Funding Information:
VH has received honoraria for speaking at symposia and participating in advisory boards for Amgen, Roche, Merck Serono and Sanofi. He has also received research funding from Amgen, Roche, Merck Serono and Sanofi and travel support from Roche and Merck Serono. JYD has participated in advisory boards and/or spoken at symposia for Amgen, Merck Serono, Roche and Pfizer and has received research funding from Merck Serono. MD has acted as a consultant to Roche and Merck Serono and has participated in advisory boards and/or symposia for Amgen, Merck Serono, Roche, Novartis, Ipsen, Pfizer and Sanofi. MP has acted as a consultant and participated in advisory boards for Amgen and has also received honoraria and research funding from Amgen, Merck Serono, Ipsen, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi.
PY - 2013/10/1
Y1 - 2013/10/1
N2 - In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), an improved understanding of the underlying pathology and molecular biology has successfully merged with advances in diagnostic techniques and local/systemic therapies as well as improvements in the functioning of multidisciplinary teams, to enable tailored treatment regimens and optimized outcomes. Indeed, as a result of these advancements, median survival for patients with mCRC is now in the range of 20-24. months, having approximately tripled in the last 20. years. The identification of KRAS as a negative predictive marker for activity of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), such as panitumumab (Amgen, Thousand Oaks, USA) and cetuximab (ImClone, Branchburg, USA), has perhaps had the greatest impact on patient management. This meant that, for the first time, mCRC patients unlikely to respond to a targeted therapy could be defined ahead of treatment. Ongoing controversies such as whether patients with KRAS G13D- (or BRAF V600-) mutated tumours can still respond to EGFR-targeted mAbs and the potential impact of inter- and intra-tumour heterogeneity on tumour sampling show that the usefulness of KRAS as a biomarker has not yet been exhausted, and that other downstream biomarkers should be considered. Conversely, a predictive biomarker for anti-angiogenic agents such as bevacizumab (Genentech, San Francisco, USA) in the mCRC setting is still lacking. In this review we will discuss the discovery and ongoing investigation into predictive biomarkers for mCRC as well as how recent advances have impacted on clinical practice and ultimately the overall cost of treatment for these patients.
AB - In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), an improved understanding of the underlying pathology and molecular biology has successfully merged with advances in diagnostic techniques and local/systemic therapies as well as improvements in the functioning of multidisciplinary teams, to enable tailored treatment regimens and optimized outcomes. Indeed, as a result of these advancements, median survival for patients with mCRC is now in the range of 20-24. months, having approximately tripled in the last 20. years. The identification of KRAS as a negative predictive marker for activity of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), such as panitumumab (Amgen, Thousand Oaks, USA) and cetuximab (ImClone, Branchburg, USA), has perhaps had the greatest impact on patient management. This meant that, for the first time, mCRC patients unlikely to respond to a targeted therapy could be defined ahead of treatment. Ongoing controversies such as whether patients with KRAS G13D- (or BRAF V600-) mutated tumours can still respond to EGFR-targeted mAbs and the potential impact of inter- and intra-tumour heterogeneity on tumour sampling show that the usefulness of KRAS as a biomarker has not yet been exhausted, and that other downstream biomarkers should be considered. Conversely, a predictive biomarker for anti-angiogenic agents such as bevacizumab (Genentech, San Francisco, USA) in the mCRC setting is still lacking. In this review we will discuss the discovery and ongoing investigation into predictive biomarkers for mCRC as well as how recent advances have impacted on clinical practice and ultimately the overall cost of treatment for these patients.
KW - Biomarker
KW - Cetuximab
KW - Colorectal cancer
KW - Companion diagnostic
KW - Epidermal growth factor receptor
KW - Genomics
KW - KRAS testing
KW - Panitumumab
KW - Personalised medicine
KW - Targeted therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878928981&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.12.011
DO - 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.12.011
M3 - Review article
C2 - 23375249
AN - SCOPUS:84878928981
SN - 0305-7372
VL - 39
SP - 592
EP - 601
JO - Cancer Treatment Reviews
JF - Cancer Treatment Reviews
IS - 6
ER -