The Effect of Corticosteroids on Prostate Cancer Outcome Following Treatment with Enzalutamide: A Multivariate Analysis of the Phase III AFFIRM Trial

Jimmy L. Zhao, Karim Fizazi, Fred Saad, Kim N. Chi, Mary Ellen Taplin, Cora N. Sternberg, Andrew J. Armstrong, Johann S. de Bono, William T. Duggan, Howard I. Scher

    Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Résumé

    Purpose: The clinical impact of concurrent corticosteroid use (CCU) on enzalutamide-treated patients with metastatic castrationresistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is unknown. We investigated the association of CCU with overall survival (OS), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), and time to prostate-specific antigen progression (TTPP) in post-chemotherapy, enzalutamide- treated patients with mCRPC. Patients and Methods: Post hoc analysis of AFFIRM (NCT00974311) with patients (n = 1,199) randomized 2:1 to enzalutamide 160 mg/day or placebo. Treatment group, CCU, and known prognostic factors were evaluated for impact on OS, rPFS, and TTPP using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. CCU was defined as "baseline"(use started at baseline) or "on-study"(baseline plus use that was started during the trial). Results: Enzalutamide significantly improved OS, rPFS, and TTPP independent of baselineCCUbut was associated with inferior clinical outcomes when compared with no baseline CCU, including a shorter OS [10.8 months vs. not reached (NR); HR for use vs. no use, 2.13;95%confidence interval (CI), 1.79-2.54], rPFS (5.2 months vs. 8.0 months; HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.29-1.72], and TTPP (4.6 months vs. 5.7 months; HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.25-1.81). These findings held in a multivariate analysis adjusting for baseline prognostic factors wherein baselineCCUwas independently associated with decreased OS (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.43-2.04; P < 0.0001) and rPFS (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.11-1.48; P = 0.0007). Conclusions: Patients with mCRPC benefited from enzalutamide treatment independent of CCU, but CCU was associated with worse baseline prognostic factors and outcomes.

    langue originaleAnglais
    Pages (de - à)860-869
    Nombre de pages10
    journalClinical Cancer Research
    Volume28
    Numéro de publication5
    Les DOIs
    étatPublié - 1 mars 2022

    Contient cette citation