TY - JOUR
T1 - The Price of Tumor Control
T2 - An Analysis of Rare Side Effects of Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy in Metastatic Melanoma from the Ipilimumab Network
AU - Voskens, Caroline J.
AU - Goldinger, Simone M.
AU - Loquai, Carmen
AU - Robert, Caroline
AU - Kaehler, Katharina C.
AU - Berking, Carola
AU - Bergmann, Tanja
AU - Bockmeyer, Clemens L.
AU - Eigentler, Thomas
AU - Fluck, Michael
AU - Garbe, Claus
AU - Gutzmer, Ralf
AU - Grabbe, Stephan
AU - Hauschild, Axel
AU - Hein, Rüdiger
AU - Hundorfean, Gheorghe
AU - Justich, Armin
AU - Keller, Ullrich
AU - Klein, Christina
AU - Mateus, Christine
AU - Mohr, Peter
AU - Paetzold, Sylvie
AU - Satzger, Imke
AU - Schadendorf, Dirk
AU - Schlaeppi, Marc
AU - Schuler, Gerold
AU - Schuler-Thurner, Beatrice
AU - Trefzer, Uwe
AU - Ulrich, Jens
AU - Vaubel, Julia
AU - von Moos, Roger
AU - Weder, Patrik
AU - Wilhelm, Tabea
AU - Göppner, Daniela
AU - Dummer, Reinhard
AU - Heinzerling, Lucie M.
PY - 2013/1/18
Y1 - 2013/1/18
N2 - Background: Ipilimumab, a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) blocking antibody, has been approved for the treatment of metastatic melanoma and induces adverse events (AE) in up to 64% of patients. Treatment algorithms for the management of common ipilimumab-induced AEs have lead to a reduction of morbidity, e.g. due to bowel perforations. However, the spectrum of less common AEs is expanding as ipilimumab is increasingly applied. Stringent recognition and management of AEs will reduce drug-induced morbidity and costs, and thus, positively impact the cost-benefit ratio of the drug. To facilitate timely identification and adequate management data on rare AEs were analyzed at 19 skin cancer centers. Methods and Findings: Patient files (n = 752) were screened for rare ipilimumab-associated AEs. A total of 120 AEs, some of which were life-threatening or even fatal, were reported and summarized by organ system describing the most instructive cases in detail. Previously unreported AEs like drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), granulomatous inflammation of the central nervous system, and aseptic meningitis, were documented. Obstacles included patientś delay in reporting symptoms and the differentiation of steroid-induced from ipilimumab-induced AEs under steroid treatment. Importantly, response rate was high in this patient population with tumor regression in 30.9% and a tumor control rate of 61.8% in stage IV melanoma patients despite the fact that some patients received only two of four recommended ipilimumab infusions. This suggests that ipilimumab-induced antitumor responses can have an early onset and that severe autoimmune reactions may reflect overtreatment. Conclusion: The wide spectrum of ipilimumab-induced AEs demands doctor and patient awareness to reduce morbidity and treatment costs and true ipilimumab success is dictated by both objective tumor responses and controlling severe side effects.
AB - Background: Ipilimumab, a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) blocking antibody, has been approved for the treatment of metastatic melanoma and induces adverse events (AE) in up to 64% of patients. Treatment algorithms for the management of common ipilimumab-induced AEs have lead to a reduction of morbidity, e.g. due to bowel perforations. However, the spectrum of less common AEs is expanding as ipilimumab is increasingly applied. Stringent recognition and management of AEs will reduce drug-induced morbidity and costs, and thus, positively impact the cost-benefit ratio of the drug. To facilitate timely identification and adequate management data on rare AEs were analyzed at 19 skin cancer centers. Methods and Findings: Patient files (n = 752) were screened for rare ipilimumab-associated AEs. A total of 120 AEs, some of which were life-threatening or even fatal, were reported and summarized by organ system describing the most instructive cases in detail. Previously unreported AEs like drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), granulomatous inflammation of the central nervous system, and aseptic meningitis, were documented. Obstacles included patientś delay in reporting symptoms and the differentiation of steroid-induced from ipilimumab-induced AEs under steroid treatment. Importantly, response rate was high in this patient population with tumor regression in 30.9% and a tumor control rate of 61.8% in stage IV melanoma patients despite the fact that some patients received only two of four recommended ipilimumab infusions. This suggests that ipilimumab-induced antitumor responses can have an early onset and that severe autoimmune reactions may reflect overtreatment. Conclusion: The wide spectrum of ipilimumab-induced AEs demands doctor and patient awareness to reduce morbidity and treatment costs and true ipilimumab success is dictated by both objective tumor responses and controlling severe side effects.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872339660&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0053745
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0053745
M3 - Article
C2 - 23341990
AN - SCOPUS:84872339660
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 8
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 1
M1 - e53745
ER -