TY - JOUR
T1 - Time to progression ratio in cancer patients enrolled in early phase clinical trials
T2 - time for new guidelines?
AU - Watson, Sarah
AU - Menis, Jessica
AU - Baldini, Capucine
AU - Martin-Romano, Patricia
AU - Michot, Jean Marie
AU - Hollebecque, Antoine
AU - Armand, Jean Pierre
AU - Massard, Christophe
AU - Soria, Jean Charles
AU - Postel-Vinay, Sophie
AU - Paoletti, Xavier
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Cancer Research UK.
PY - 2018/10/16
Y1 - 2018/10/16
N2 - Background: Reliable evaluation of treatment benefit in early phase clinical trials is necessary. The time to progression ratio (TTPr), which compares successive TTP in a single patient, is a powerful criteria for determining targeted or immune therapies efficacy. Methods: We evaluated 205 TTPr in a large cohort of 177 advanced cancer patients enrolled in at least two Phase 1/1b trials (out of 2827 phase 1/1b-treated patients) at Gustave Roussy. Results: This first wide description of TTPr showed that, under the hypothesis of overall absence of treatment line effect, the median TTPr was 0.7 and that 25% of patients presented a TTPr above the conventional efficacy threshold of 1.3. Conclusions: A higher median TTPr and a larger proportion of patients above the 1.3 threshold should therefore be achieved to conclude to drug efficacy. New guidelines for TTPr interpretation and calibration are proposed, which warrant independent prospective validation.
AB - Background: Reliable evaluation of treatment benefit in early phase clinical trials is necessary. The time to progression ratio (TTPr), which compares successive TTP in a single patient, is a powerful criteria for determining targeted or immune therapies efficacy. Methods: We evaluated 205 TTPr in a large cohort of 177 advanced cancer patients enrolled in at least two Phase 1/1b trials (out of 2827 phase 1/1b-treated patients) at Gustave Roussy. Results: This first wide description of TTPr showed that, under the hypothesis of overall absence of treatment line effect, the median TTPr was 0.7 and that 25% of patients presented a TTPr above the conventional efficacy threshold of 1.3. Conclusions: A higher median TTPr and a larger proportion of patients above the 1.3 threshold should therefore be achieved to conclude to drug efficacy. New guidelines for TTPr interpretation and calibration are proposed, which warrant independent prospective validation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055106354&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41416-018-0245-0
DO - 10.1038/s41416-018-0245-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 30327567
AN - SCOPUS:85055106354
SN - 0007-0920
VL - 119
SP - 937
EP - 939
JO - British Journal of Cancer
JF - British Journal of Cancer
IS - 8
ER -