Time to progression ratio in cancer patients enrolled in early phase clinical trials: time for new guidelines?

Sarah Watson, Jessica Menis, Capucine Baldini, Patricia Martin-Romano, Jean Marie Michot, Antoine Hollebecque, Jean Pierre Armand, Christophe Massard, Jean Charles Soria, Sophie Postel-Vinay, Xavier Paoletti

    Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Résumé

    Background: Reliable evaluation of treatment benefit in early phase clinical trials is necessary. The time to progression ratio (TTPr), which compares successive TTP in a single patient, is a powerful criteria for determining targeted or immune therapies efficacy. Methods: We evaluated 205 TTPr in a large cohort of 177 advanced cancer patients enrolled in at least two Phase 1/1b trials (out of 2827 phase 1/1b-treated patients) at Gustave Roussy. Results: This first wide description of TTPr showed that, under the hypothesis of overall absence of treatment line effect, the median TTPr was 0.7 and that 25% of patients presented a TTPr above the conventional efficacy threshold of 1.3. Conclusions: A higher median TTPr and a larger proportion of patients above the 1.3 threshold should therefore be achieved to conclude to drug efficacy. New guidelines for TTPr interpretation and calibration are proposed, which warrant independent prospective validation.

    langue originaleAnglais
    Pages (de - à)937-939
    Nombre de pages3
    journalBritish Journal of Cancer
    Volume119
    Numéro de publication8
    Les DOIs
    étatPublié - 16 oct. 2018

    Contient cette citation