TY - JOUR
T1 - Trachelectomy and Cerclage Placement as Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Cervical Cancer—An Expert Survey
AU - Smits, Anke
AU - Wolswinkel, Janneke T.
AU - Eikelder, Mieke L.G.ten
AU - Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
AU - Baiocchi, Glauco
AU - Beltman, Jogchum J.
AU - Covens, Allan
AU - Cornel, Karlijn M.C.
AU - Falconer, Henrik
AU - Fotopoulou, Christina
AU - Gerestein, Cornelis G.
AU - Gil-Ibanez, Blanca
AU - Hillemanns, Peter
AU - Köhler, Christhardt
AU - Kucukmetin, Ali
AU - van Lonkhuijzen, Luc R.C.W.
AU - Morice, Philippe
AU - Nam, Joo Hyun
AU - Perrotta, Myriam B.
AU - Persson, Jan
AU - Plante, Marie
AU - Querleu, Denis
AU - Ribeiro, Reitan
AU - Ungár, Laszlo
AU - van Ham, Maaike A.P.C.
AU - Zusterzeel, Petra L.M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025/3/1
Y1 - 2025/3/1
N2 - Background/Objectives: Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) is a standard practice for managing early stage cervical cancer, yet significant variation exists in clinical approaches worldwide. Our objective was to ascertain current practices and preferences for cerclage use among expert centers globally regarding FSS in patients with early stage cervical cancer. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey from May to July 2023 involving expert centers identified through their scientific contributions and participation in international workgroups and conferences. The survey, comprising 27 questions, evaluated existing practices in FSS. Results: Out of the centers surveyed, 21 (36.2%) gynecologic oncologists responded. For tumors <2 cm, 86% of centers preferred radical trachelectomy, primarily via the vaginal approach, while 13.6% favored a simple trachelectomy. Three experts preferred simple trachelectomy (13.6%). For tumors >2 cm, 47.6% utilized neoadjuvant chemotherapy before trachelectomy. Others did not offer FSS or performed an abdominal radical trachelectomy. Over time, there has been a shift towards less radical surgeries for tumors <2 cm and increased use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for larger tumors. Some abandoned the minimally invasive surgical approach. Nearly all experts (90.5%) placed a cerclage immediately following trachelectomy. Conclusions: The majority of experts opt for radical trachelectomy in early stage cervical cancer, with immediate cerclage placement being a common practice. However, considerable international variations highlight the urgent need for standardized guidelines and further research to optimize treatment strategies, balancing oncological safety with fertility outcomes.
AB - Background/Objectives: Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) is a standard practice for managing early stage cervical cancer, yet significant variation exists in clinical approaches worldwide. Our objective was to ascertain current practices and preferences for cerclage use among expert centers globally regarding FSS in patients with early stage cervical cancer. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey from May to July 2023 involving expert centers identified through their scientific contributions and participation in international workgroups and conferences. The survey, comprising 27 questions, evaluated existing practices in FSS. Results: Out of the centers surveyed, 21 (36.2%) gynecologic oncologists responded. For tumors <2 cm, 86% of centers preferred radical trachelectomy, primarily via the vaginal approach, while 13.6% favored a simple trachelectomy. Three experts preferred simple trachelectomy (13.6%). For tumors >2 cm, 47.6% utilized neoadjuvant chemotherapy before trachelectomy. Others did not offer FSS or performed an abdominal radical trachelectomy. Over time, there has been a shift towards less radical surgeries for tumors <2 cm and increased use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for larger tumors. Some abandoned the minimally invasive surgical approach. Nearly all experts (90.5%) placed a cerclage immediately following trachelectomy. Conclusions: The majority of experts opt for radical trachelectomy in early stage cervical cancer, with immediate cerclage placement being a common practice. However, considerable international variations highlight the urgent need for standardized guidelines and further research to optimize treatment strategies, balancing oncological safety with fertility outcomes.
KW - cerclage
KW - cervical cancer
KW - fertility sparing surgery
KW - minimal invasive surgery
KW - practice variation
KW - trachelectomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105001171796&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/jpm15030077
DO - 10.3390/jpm15030077
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105001171796
SN - 2075-4426
VL - 15
JO - Journal of Personalized Medicine
JF - Journal of Personalized Medicine
IS - 3
M1 - 77
ER -