TY - JOUR
T1 - Treatment strategies for thymic carcinoma in a real-life setting. Insights from the RYTHMIC network
AU - Petat, Arthur
AU - Dansin, Eric
AU - Calcagno, Fabien
AU - Greillier, Laurent
AU - Pichon, Eric
AU - Kerjouan, Mallorie
AU - Clement-Duchene, Christelle
AU - Mennecier, Bertrand
AU - Westeel, Virginie
AU - Thillays, François
AU - Quantin, Xavier
AU - Oulkhouir, Youssef
AU - Thiberville, Luc
AU - Ricordel, Charles
AU - Thomas De Montpreville, Vincent
AU - Chalabreysse, Lara
AU - Hofman, Véronique
AU - Molina, Thierry
AU - Fournel, Pierre
AU - Bigay Game, Laurence
AU - Besse, Benjamin
AU - Girard, Nicolas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/2/1
Y1 - 2022/2/1
N2 - Background: Thymic carcinomas are aggressive and difficult to treat a subset of thymic epithelial tumours that represent a heterogeneous group of rare intrathoracic malignancies. The treatment strategy of thymic carcinomas is based on whether surgical resection may be achieved, which represents the most significant favourable prognostic factor on survival. For this study, we took advantage of the unique prospective Réseau tumeurs THYMiques et Cancer (RYTHMIC) database to describe baseline characteristics, analyse treatment strategies in light of existing guidelines and provide landmark patient outcomes data with regards to response and survival of patients in a real-life clinical practice setting. Methods: Inclusion criteria for this analysis were the following: (1) histologically-confirmed thymic carcinomas – excluding neuroendocrine tumours-after pathological review by the RYTHMIC pathology panel, (2) discussion of the case at the RYTHMIC multidisciplinary tumour board, (3) at least one active treatment modality. Results: A total of 213 patients were analysed. Overall, 60 (28%) patients were considered as surgical candidates upfront, 91 (43%) patients received primary chemotherapy, and 62 (29%) patients received exclusive chemotherapy. Median overall survival (OS) was 49.2 months (IC95%: 34.8–63.6); OS was significantly longer in patients with a lower stage at diagnosis (p < 0.001), who were operated on upfront, as opposed to patients who received primary or exclusive chemotherapy (p < 0.001). Surgery, conducted upfront or after primary chemotherapy, was significantly associated with more prolonged OS (p < 0.001); complete resection and postoperative radiotherapy were also predictors of better outcome (p = 0.018 and p = 0.051, respectively). Conclusions: Our cohort is the first to analyse in-depth outcomes and treatment strategies in a prospective cohort of consecutive patients with thymic carcinoma. While we confirm the major prognostic impact of surgery, our data highlight the need for optimised multidisciplinary management and innovative therapies as the survival of patients remains limited.
AB - Background: Thymic carcinomas are aggressive and difficult to treat a subset of thymic epithelial tumours that represent a heterogeneous group of rare intrathoracic malignancies. The treatment strategy of thymic carcinomas is based on whether surgical resection may be achieved, which represents the most significant favourable prognostic factor on survival. For this study, we took advantage of the unique prospective Réseau tumeurs THYMiques et Cancer (RYTHMIC) database to describe baseline characteristics, analyse treatment strategies in light of existing guidelines and provide landmark patient outcomes data with regards to response and survival of patients in a real-life clinical practice setting. Methods: Inclusion criteria for this analysis were the following: (1) histologically-confirmed thymic carcinomas – excluding neuroendocrine tumours-after pathological review by the RYTHMIC pathology panel, (2) discussion of the case at the RYTHMIC multidisciplinary tumour board, (3) at least one active treatment modality. Results: A total of 213 patients were analysed. Overall, 60 (28%) patients were considered as surgical candidates upfront, 91 (43%) patients received primary chemotherapy, and 62 (29%) patients received exclusive chemotherapy. Median overall survival (OS) was 49.2 months (IC95%: 34.8–63.6); OS was significantly longer in patients with a lower stage at diagnosis (p < 0.001), who were operated on upfront, as opposed to patients who received primary or exclusive chemotherapy (p < 0.001). Surgery, conducted upfront or after primary chemotherapy, was significantly associated with more prolonged OS (p < 0.001); complete resection and postoperative radiotherapy were also predictors of better outcome (p = 0.018 and p = 0.051, respectively). Conclusions: Our cohort is the first to analyse in-depth outcomes and treatment strategies in a prospective cohort of consecutive patients with thymic carcinoma. While we confirm the major prognostic impact of surgery, our data highlight the need for optimised multidisciplinary management and innovative therapies as the survival of patients remains limited.
KW - Chemotherapy
KW - Guidelines
KW - Radiotherapy
KW - Surgery
KW - Thymic carcinoma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121797720&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.11.028
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.11.028
M3 - Article
C2 - 34965496
AN - SCOPUS:85121797720
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 162
SP - 118
EP - 127
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
ER -