TY - JOUR
T1 - Weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus docetaxel as second- or third-line treatment in advanced non-squamous non–small-cell lung cancer
T2 - Results of the IFCT-1103 ULTIMATE study
AU - Cortot, Alexis B.
AU - Audigier-Valette, Clarisse
AU - Molinier, Olivier
AU - Le Moulec, Sylvestre
AU - Barlesi, Fabrice
AU - Zalcman, Gérard
AU - Dumont, Patrick
AU - Pouessel, Damien
AU - Poulet, Claire
AU - Fontaine-Delaruelle, Clara
AU - Hiret, Sandrine
AU - Dixmier, Adrien
AU - Renault, Patrick Aldo
AU - Becht, Catherine
AU - Raffy, Olivier
AU - Dayen, Charles
AU - Mazieres, Julien
AU - Pichon, Eric
AU - Langlais, Alexandra
AU - Morin, Franck
AU - Moro-Sibilot, Denis
AU - Besse, Benjamin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/5/1
Y1 - 2020/5/1
N2 - Purpose: Second-line chemotherapy regimens have demonstrated poor benefit after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-squamous non–small-cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC). Methods: In this multicentre, open-label phase III trial, patients with advanced nsNSCLC treated with one or two prior lines, including one platinum-based doublet, were centrally randomised to receive 90 mg/m2 of paclitaxel (D1, D8, D15) plus 10 mg/kg of bevacizumab (D1, D15) every 28 days or docetaxel (75 mg/m2) every 21 days; crossover was allowed after disease progression. Primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT01763671. Results: One hundred sixty six patients were randomised (paclitaxel plus bevacizumab: 111, docetaxel: 55). The median PFS was longer in patients receiving paclitaxel plus bevacizumab than in patients receveing docetaxel [5·4 months versus 3·9 months, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0·61 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0·44–0·86); p = 0·005]. Objective response rates (ORRs) were 22·5% (95% CI: 14·8–30·3) and 5·5% (95% CI: 0·0–11·5) (p = 0·006), respectively. Median overall survivals were similar (adjusted HR 1·17; p = 0·50). Crossover occurred in 21 of 55 (38·2%) docetaxel-treated patients. Grade III-IV adverse events (AEs) were reported in 45·9% and 54·5% of patients treated with paclitaxel and bevacizumab or docetaxel, respectively (p = NS), including neutropenia (19·3% versus 45·4%), neuropathy (8·3% versus 0·0%) and hypertension (7·3% versus 0·0%). Three patients died due to treatment-related AEs (1·8% in each group). Conclusion: Weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab as second- or third-line improves PFS and ORR compared with docetaxel in patients with nsNSCLC, with an acceptable safety profile. These results place weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab as a valid option in this population. Clinical trials registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01763671.
AB - Purpose: Second-line chemotherapy regimens have demonstrated poor benefit after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-squamous non–small-cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC). Methods: In this multicentre, open-label phase III trial, patients with advanced nsNSCLC treated with one or two prior lines, including one platinum-based doublet, were centrally randomised to receive 90 mg/m2 of paclitaxel (D1, D8, D15) plus 10 mg/kg of bevacizumab (D1, D15) every 28 days or docetaxel (75 mg/m2) every 21 days; crossover was allowed after disease progression. Primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT01763671. Results: One hundred sixty six patients were randomised (paclitaxel plus bevacizumab: 111, docetaxel: 55). The median PFS was longer in patients receiving paclitaxel plus bevacizumab than in patients receveing docetaxel [5·4 months versus 3·9 months, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0·61 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0·44–0·86); p = 0·005]. Objective response rates (ORRs) were 22·5% (95% CI: 14·8–30·3) and 5·5% (95% CI: 0·0–11·5) (p = 0·006), respectively. Median overall survivals were similar (adjusted HR 1·17; p = 0·50). Crossover occurred in 21 of 55 (38·2%) docetaxel-treated patients. Grade III-IV adverse events (AEs) were reported in 45·9% and 54·5% of patients treated with paclitaxel and bevacizumab or docetaxel, respectively (p = NS), including neutropenia (19·3% versus 45·4%), neuropathy (8·3% versus 0·0%) and hypertension (7·3% versus 0·0%). Three patients died due to treatment-related AEs (1·8% in each group). Conclusion: Weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab as second- or third-line improves PFS and ORR compared with docetaxel in patients with nsNSCLC, with an acceptable safety profile. These results place weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab as a valid option in this population. Clinical trials registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01763671.
KW - Bevacizumab
KW - Docetaxel
KW - NSCLC
KW - Paclitaxel
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082740516&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.02.022
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.02.022
M3 - Article
C2 - 32276179
AN - SCOPUS:85082740516
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 131
SP - 27
EP - 36
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
ER -